- Messages
- 7,614
- Reaction score
- 9,257
- Points
- 113
My friend and I disagree over when a licence is needed to breed dogs. This is purely hypothetical - neither of us ever have any intention of breeding, but we don't let that hold us back from having a good argument
She believes that if you breed just one litter of pups and sell them, you always need a licence. I think that you don't need a licence if you just breed and sell one litter as a 'hobby', particularly if you keep one of the pups so can regard the rest of the litter as 'surplus'. I have found some legalese that I think backs me up, but legalese is always a bit murky.
Could anyone tell me who is right, please, preferably giving sources?
She believes that if you breed just one litter of pups and sell them, you always need a licence. I think that you don't need a licence if you just breed and sell one litter as a 'hobby', particularly if you keep one of the pups so can regard the rest of the litter as 'surplus'. I have found some legalese that I think backs me up, but legalese is always a bit murky.
Could anyone tell me who is right, please, preferably giving sources?