- Messages
- 1,277
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
aNY ONE SEE IT.........
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
aNY ONE SEE IT.........
A civil question but could you be more specific.. prison for coursers or diggers, if its the latter I whole heartedly agree..I saw it and think if they got bigger fines or even prison sentences it might deter the evil b.....ds that cause so much suffering to our wildlife
you got it in one tony ( diggers)A civil question but could you be more specific.. prison for coursers or diggers, if its the latter I whole heartedly agree..I saw it and think if they got bigger fines or even prison sentences it might deter the evil b.....ds that cause so much suffering to our wildlife
So you think diggers should get custodial sentences but not poachers because thats what the lads from Wales were doing Hare Coursing when it was legal was done with the landowners permission :thumbsup: if you did nt have the landowners permission then it became poaching, still Hare coursing sounds more emotive to the publicyou got it in one tony ( diggers)A civil question but could you be more specific.. prison for coursers or diggers, if its the latter I whole heartedly agree..I saw it and think if they got bigger fines or even prison sentences it might deter the evil b.....ds that cause so much suffering to our wildlife
Both lots were breaking the law so should be punished equally IMO. The sort of hare coursing they were doing was illegal, permission or not. It is illegal.So you think diggers should get custodial sentences but not poachers because thats what the lads from Wales were doing Hare Coursing when it was legal was done with the landowners permission :thumbsup: if you did nt have the landowners permission then it became poaching, still Hare coursing sounds more emotive to the publicyou got it in one tony ( diggers)A civil question but could you be more specific.. prison for coursers or diggers, if its the latter I whole heartedly agree..I saw it and think if they got bigger fines or even prison sentences it might deter the evil b.....ds that cause so much suffering to our wildlife
Both lots were breaking the law so should be punished equally IMO. The sort of hare coursing they were doing was illegal, permission or not. It is illegal.So you think diggers should get custodial sentences but not poachers because thats what the lads from Wales were doing Hare Coursing when it was legal was done with the landowners permission :thumbsup: if you did nt have the landowners permission then it became poaching, still Hare coursing sounds more emotive to the publicyou got it in one tony ( diggers)A civil question but could you be more specific.. prison for coursers or diggers, if its the latter I whole heartedly agree..I saw it and think if they got bigger fines or even prison sentences it might deter the evil b.....ds that cause so much suffering to our wildlife
All the coursing ban has done is stop us law abiding folk. it hasn't stopped the scum and travellers who think it's ok to drive the fields and kill everything in sight. You can't call these folk coursing men there just parasites. I have no time at all for these as there making it much more difficult for whippet and lurcher owners to get rabbiting permission as farmers tar us all with the same brush unfortunately. And badger baiters don't get me going on these i have no time at all for them and to put hare coursers and badger baiters in the same sentence just isn't right. Most hare coursers respect there quarry and the land they run on
I'm quite privileged in that i can still allow my dogs to chase Hares legally here in the uk using a couple of methods. Flushing to the gun and with the use of a hawk.